|
INFORMATION LITERACY
From Identifying Needs to Evaluating Sources
By Nancy Lane
Information may be one word in answer to a simple
question, such as “What’s the weather like today?” Or
it may be contained in a wide range of books, journals, and computer databases
that help to provide answers to complex research questions, such as “What
causes cancer?”
It is useful to think of information as part of a continuum: Data>Information>Knowledge>Understanding>Communication.
Data are the facts and figures, based on observation, surveys,
or research that have been collected and are available for use. Information
consists of data that have been organized for the potential benefit of
individuals. Knowledge is information that individuals recognize
as relevant and think about and interpret, gaining understanding.
They may also use this understanding for a purpose, which usually involves
communication.
Information literacy is knowing when you need information, what
you need, where to find it, and how to evaluate and organize it. The report
published in 1989 by the American Library Association’s Presidential
Committee on Information Literacy (www.infolit.org/documents/89Report.htm)
stated that “teaching facts is a poor substitute for teaching people
how to learn, i.e., giving them the skills to be able to locate, evaluate,
and effectively use information for any given need.”
The American Association of School Librarians published a position statement
in 1996 that outlined nine information literacy standards for student
learning (www.ala.org/aasl/ip_nine.html)
(see sidebar). Pacific teachers should consider these standards and adapt
them as appropriate to the print and media resources available through
their school and through their local public and college libraries.
Although the Internet is becoming increasingly more important for research,
students must be selective in deciding whether it is the best source for
answering an information query. A printed source or a telephone call may
be better, faster, and cheaper.
When the Internet is likely to be the best source, students must use a
range of searching and evaluation skills to ensure that the information
they retrieve is in fact authoritative, useful, and relevant. A website
that provides links to a range of criteria for evaluating the quality
of website information is at www.vuw.ac.nz/~agsmith/evaln/evaln.htm.
Unless students are taught critical thinking and evaluation skills with
respect to information literacy, the fears of the Librarian of Congress,
James Billington, may become real. As he wrote in “A Technological
Flood Requires Human Navigators” (American Libraries, 27(6),
1996, p. 39), “I am haunted by the thought that all this miscellaneous,
unsorted, unverified, constantly changing information on the Internet
may inundate knowledge, may move us back down the evolutionary chain from
knowledge to information, from information to raw data.”
Nancy Lane is the Director of Communications
at PREL. |